My main research interest lies in changing conceptions of dwelling and belonging in medieval and early modern texts.  I also have a deep interest in Frankfurt School Critical Theory and European modernism and am currently writing an article about utopia and Heimweh in the works of Shakespeare,  Joyce and Ernst Bloch (via. Nina Simone, Nick Cave and Thomas Mann). I was educated at the University of London and have recently published my first monograph, Shakespeare’s Folly: Philosophy, Humanism, Critical Theory (Routledge, 2016).

I am an Honorary Research Fellow of Kingston University. I have devised, taught and assessed a university course about literature and affect, ‘Desire Pain and Pleasure in the Medieval and Early Modern Imagination’, for the Károli Gáspár University, Budapest and I have devised a series of six Shakespeare courses for High School students in collaboration with the Szabó Ervin Library, Budapest and the British Council. Prior to this, I worked at Royal Holloway, University of London.  I am currently supervising an undergraduate dissertation on the iconography of twelfth century medical texts.

Shakespeare’s Folly


This study contends that folly is of fundamental importance to the implicit philosophical vision of Shakespeare’s drama. The discourse of folly’s wordplay, jubilant ironies, and vertiginous paradoxes furnish Shakespeare with a way of understanding that lays bare the hypocrisies and absurdities of the serious world. Like Erasmus, More, and Montaigne before him, Shakespeare employs folly as a mode of understanding that does not arrogantly insist upon the veracity of its own claims; a fool’s truth, after all, is spoken by a fool. Yet, as this study demonstrates, Shakespearean folly is not the sole preserve of professional jesters and garrulous clowns, for it is also apparent on a thematic, conceptual and formal level in virtually all of his plays.

Examining canonical histories, comedies, and tragedies, this study is the first to either contextualize Shakespearean folly within European humanist thought, or to argue that Shakespeare’s philosophy of folly is part of a subterranean strand of Western philosophy, which itself reflects upon the folly of the wise. This strand runs from the philosopher-fool Socrates through to Montaigne and on to Nietzsche, but finds its most sustained expression in the Critical Theory of the mid to late twentieth-century, when the self-destructive potential latent in rationality had become a reality. This book makes a substantial contribution to the fields of Shakespeare, Renaissance humanism, Critical Theory, and Literature and Philosophy. It illustrates, moreover, how rediscovering the philosophical potential of folly may enable us to resist the growing dominance of instrumental thought in the cultural sphere.

You can find and buy the book on Amazon and Routledge.